Messages posted by: Mikkel

I dont have a mac to test it and develop it on yet, when that time comes I'll try to do that.

Its strange that only I can see the obvious..if the same two belt changes are at stake in each and every fight and you cant put individual belts on the line=same as one belt.

Ray Johnson wrote:

Redneck wrote:i got a crazy idea. Why dont bring OBA, OBF, OBW and OBC belt back in ONE Room? Rankings count to get shots for the belts in just ONE room. So we still can get a superchamp but no trouble with all the different rooms.
I like this one room changing from mikkel but i miss the 4 counting belts, too. That would be a great solution if possible to make. But others should like the idea, too. Who knows..maybe the most like just one belt.
just a crazy idea...

Redneck

I like this idea very much. One minor problem is that, if someone has 2+ belts, how would you decide which title the challenger is fighting for? I'm sure that can be worked out, though. Cool idea.

What is the difference of having ONE belt on the line or TWO..the winner will have all belts always, and there want be more title fights or more champions than now.

If you cant win/lose individual title, then whats the idea of a superchamp ?

Perhaps your recent behavior is better, I dont know..I doubt it..like I said, people here tend to forget the past so they give you the benefit of the doubt.
That you come here once in a while demanding title shots left and right, is a little silly.
Anyway HTF defended against Vitor Belfort, so he has done his duty as a champ.

Not really thrashing you, just pointing out the obvious, and why it's legit for HTF to ignore your challenges.

Dick E. Boon 2 wrote:

Professor wrote:Vitor is fucking sick. I only see him getting better.

True, Vitor has John-like potential. He's a raw diamond. Very unconventional fighter. If he continues to play he will be champ soon.

@redneck, I agree with most of what you say, but I'd prefer if you would do your talking in the ring and not on the forum. You used to be very active and suddenly you retired. OB needs active players, come back please and make some statements in the ring.

@htf, yea you should have given Reaper a shot, you probably would have beaten him as you are the better fighter. Thats the great thing about John, he fight everybody all the time for his title. That you dont fight me because of my ping okay, I understand, but please keep the game interesting to others by fighting them when you hold the belt.

As far as I remember, Reaper dont have a great history with title fights..he dont rematch if he wins, get multiple shots even after losses because of begging, he sits on title until stripped, he is not very active and does not really deserve a shot. Please, try remember the past folks.

In all fairness HTF is not destroying the game, he is a player AND a moderator at the same time...just because he is a moderator doesnt mean he cant talk thrash on the forum..or the lobby.
I also wonder how one player singlehandedly could "destroy" the game..

Id try to reiinstall the game.

Mikkel wrote:p2p means peer to peer not pay to play.

p2p means peer to peer not pay to play.

p2p means peer to peer not pay to play.

I'll make that one day when I have time, just dont think it would make a big difference right now in how many plays the game.

im a god

Alright, give me a few days to sort it out.

I'll post the original Commodore file then. You can play against the cpu and another player (two player). But there's no online play, since that didn't exist at the time.